Experts are issuing new warnings about the growing cancer risks tied to lab-grown fake “meat,” raising alarms about a product marketed as the future of “sustainable” food but built on technology disturbingly similar to tumor biology.
Lab-grown meat depends on immortalized cell lines, which are engineered to replicate endlessly, just like cancer.
Scientists note that this alone warrants major concern, yet companies in the space refuse to disclose key genetic modifications, growth factors, antibiotics, or chemical inputs used to accelerate the process.
However, the regulators approving these products aren’t asking many questions.
Florida and several other states have already banned lab-grown “meat,” citing inadequate safety data and growing distrust of corporate-controlled food systems.
The warnings now spreading across the food-safety world suggest those bans may have been well warranted.
Campbell’s Controversy Reignites Fears Over Lab-Grown Ingredients
It amid amid growing concerns that products already sold in the food supply chain contain lab-grown “meats” without consumers being made aware.
Campbell’s Soup Company is now under scrutiny after leaked audio exposed an executive mocking customers.
Martin Bally, Campbell’s vice-president of information technology, referred to one of the company’s ingredients as “bioengineered meat” and suggested that some company products contained “lab-grown ‘chicken from a 3D printer.’”
He also describes the firm’s offerings as “sh*t for f**king poor people.”
Campbell’s denies the allegation, but the uproar has reignited concerns about the safety, secrecy, and regulatory gaps surrounding lab-grown “meat.”
Consumer advocates and food-safety specialists say the industry’s refusal to disclose what genes, growth factors, and engineered inputs are being used makes it impossible to assess long-term toxicity or carcinogenic potential.
Lab-Grown Meat Resembles Cancer More Than Food
The technology for lab-grown “meat” relies on genetically engineered growth factors and immortalized cell lines that behave like cancer cells.
Companies such as Memphis Meats and Eat Just have not disclosed which genes they engineer into their cell lines, meaning consumers have no way of knowing whether they are ingesting materials linked to cancer pathways.
Attorney Tom Renz goes even further, arguing that lab-grown “meat” fulfills “the definition of cancer in more ways than I can count.”
Unlike real animals with immune systems, lab-grown tissue has no natural defense mechanisms, forcing companies to depend on antibiotics and chemical treatments that may linger in the final product.
Lab-Grown Meat Production Raises Red Flags
The National Cancer Institute defines cancer as uncontrolled cell division.
That is exactly the mechanism used to mass-produce cultivated meat.
Producers extract cells from animals or purchase them from cell banks, then grow them in bioreactors using recombinant DNA technology, CRISPR gene editing, and genetically engineered growth factors.
Critics warn that this process can introduce unintended mutations and genetic abnormalities that may carry over into the final product.
Claire Robinson of GMWatch warns that the engineering involved “introduces ‘unintended health effects,’ including mutations that could be absorbed into the human bloodstream.”
Regulatory Oversight Is Weak, and Companies Hide the Ingredients
Despite the biological risks, the FDA’s approval process remains minimal.
The agency’s system of “pre-market consultation” is widely considered to be grossly inadequate.
Lab-grown meat will be “proprietary,” shielding formulations behind trade-secret protections and preventing consumers from knowing what they are eating.
States Push Back as Trust in Big Food Collapses
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has launched an investigation into Campbell’s, reaffirming the state’s ban on lab-grown meat.
Gov. Ron DeSantis argues the issue represents a broader fight against “the global elite’s plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish.”
Multiple states have now banned lab-grown meat, and more are considering similar legislation.
This fight isn’t just about one product; it’s about whether corporations and governments can quietly replace natural food with genetically engineered, synthetic alternatives while withholding critical safety data from the public.
A Broader Food-Transparency Crisis
The controversy comes as Campbell’s also faces lawsuits over heavy metal contamination in baby food, including allegations linking exposure to autism and ADHD.
A federal judge recently allowed several claims to proceed, underscoring deep cracks in the system meant to protect consumers.
Renz warns that if companies “are selling biologically immortalized cell lines while marketing them as ‘natural’ meat, litigation is inevitable.”
A Crossroads for Food Safety in America
For many experts and consumers, the debate over lab-grown meat is no longer academic.
It’s about transparency.
It’s about regulatory capture.
And it’s about whether the public even has the right to know what they are eating.
With trust in institutions falling and food scandals multiplying, the push toward organic, local, and decentralized food systems is accelerating.
The outstanding question, and the one regulators must now answer, is whether the government will prioritize public health or corporate profits.
https://slaynews.com/news/experts-sound-alarm-cancer-risk-lab-grown-meat/
No comments:
Post a Comment