Sunday, July 5, 2026

'Little Commie BAST**D' Zohran Mamdani Tries Backpedaling on His 'America Sucks' July 4 Speech and HOOBOY

New York City’s socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani, tried to play nice on the Fourth of July with a post that suddenly discovered the word 'patriotism,' but not before reminding everyone that real love for America means obsessing over its flaws and turning every holiday into a lecture on 'righteous dissent.'

Yawn.

So edgy.

This comes just days after his earlier speech, which spent more time crapping all over the country’s history, founders, and current state than celebrating anything. The contrast was lost on no one, especially conservatives who watched the Ugandan-born mayor’s latest attempt at sounding like a normal American fall completely flat.

Here's his so-called 'patriotic' post:

Post continues:

... of its inhabitants can shape. What an honor us New Yorkers have, to look out over our city’s waters from the shores where so many Americans bravely entered their country for the first time.

Today and all days, let us remember that patriotism is not pretending our nation is without flaws. Patriotism is every act of righteous dissent — because loving our country means fighting for the best version of it.

Happy Fourth of July, New York City.

Yeah. Sure, Zohran.

Why can't Democrats just celebrate our country? Is it really that hard? No country is perfect, duh, but it's ok to talk about how absolutely badass America is without any side comments about flaws.

Just love America.

It's not hard.

And boomity.

https://twitchy.com/samj/2026/07/05/zamdani-damage-control-n2429921

Conviction vs. Contempt: Why the Left Can't Match Trump's Moral Clarity

Hello and welcome to the day after the big day. It's July 5, 2026. My calendar says it's National Bikini Day, National Graham Cracker Day, National Apple Turnover Day, National Workaholics Day, Algeria Independence Day, and Mechanical Pencil Day — so pick your fighter today: sunbathe in swimwear invented as a nuclear metaphor, eat one-third of a s'more, or finally finish that email you've been "getting to" since Tuesday, but not all three, because even a made-up holiday deserves your undivided attention.

Today in History:

1687: Isaac Newton publishes Principia Mathematica, laying out the laws of motion and universal gravitation. 

1775: The Continental Congress adopts the Olive Branch Petition, a final appeal to King George III to avoid war. He rejects it and threatens to execute the people who wrote it. 

1811: Venezuela declares independence from Spain, launching its war for independence. 

1852: Frederick Douglass delivers his landmark speech "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?" in Rochester, N.Y.

1865: President Andrew Johnson signs the order confirming the convictions of the conspirators in Abraham Lincoln's assassination. 

1911: A deadly heat wave peaks in the northeastern U.S., with temperatures reaching 106°F in Nashua, N.H. 

1948: The United Kingdom's National Health Service begins operations, offering universal healthcare funded by taxation.

 1954: Elvis Presley records "That's All Right" at Sun Records, a session often cited as the birth of rock and roll. 

1962: Algeria gains independence from France after 132 years of colonial rule. 

1971: The 26th Amendment is certified, lowering the U.S. voting age to 18. 

1975: Cape Verde gains independence from Portugal. 

1975: Arthur Ashe defeats Jimmy Connors to become the first black man to win Wimbledon. 

1994: Amazon is incorporated, beginning as an online bookstore. 

1996: Dolly the sheep, the first mammal cloned from an adult cell, is born.

Birthdays Today Include: P.T. Barnum (circus entrepreneur, founder of the Barnum & Bailey Circus); Georges Pompidou (former president of France); Jean Cocteau (poet and filmmaker, known for Beauty and the Beast, Orpheus); Robbie Robertson (musician, guitarist for The Band); Huey Lewis (musician, frontman of Huey Lewis and the News); Bill Watterson (cartoonist, creator of Calvin and Hobbes); Edie Falco (actress, known for The Sopranos, Nurse Jackie); Kathryn Erbe (actress, known for Law & Order: Criminal Intent); Katherine Helmond (actress, known for Soap, Who’s the Boss?); RZA (musician and producer, member of Wu-Tang Clan); François Arnaud (actor, known for The Borgias).

* * *

I got to thinking last night after I watched President Donald Trump’s speech at Mount Rushmore, followed by the left's bedwetting response — the kind of reflex a bad meal at the local diner triggers right before it comes back up. And the thought landed with brutal clarity.

Trump said: "The American dream still lives, and the American flag still flies more proudly than ever before over the people who will not quit."

He also said, "The nation that will not fail, the country that will not fall no matter how hard the enemy tries — we cannot be beaten."

The contrast between the president’s speech and the leftist reaction was a stark one.

It's a little early yet for the full picture of the left's response to emerge, but we have New York City's Mayor Zohran Mamdani's. He has been a target of Trump of late, and justifiably so. He gave a competing July 4th-eve speech that didn't name Trump directly but seemed aimed at his rhetoric, invoking the idea that American ideals "are strong enough to endure any authoritarian regime, but only if we reach for them." The point Mamdani misses, of course, is that ever since Marx put pen to paper, socialism has proven itself to be the very definition of authoritarian.

Sure, the left insists it can't stomach the president because of its perception of the yawning gap between what he preaches and what he does. But here's the uglier possibility keeping leftists up at night: maybe they can't stomach him because of themselves — because of the gap between his willingness to act and their willingness to actually confront evil. The evil they themselves have championed.

My take: the left has marinated so long in ambiguity and inaction both on the world stage vis-à-vis Iran, and the socialism that has become so loud recently, that Trump's call for decisive action — and his habit of actually taking action against that evil — doesn't register as leadership. It reads as an insult to their treasured sense of nuance, their preference for negotiating with and capitulating to that evil instead.

Here's what Trump's critics won't say out loud: they've convinced themselves and are trying to convince you that opposing him with everything they've got is the defining moral fight of our era. It isn't. He already named the real one, and it was never about him. And keep in mind, it's a little hard to argue from a moral perspective when you’ve spent the last five decades arguing against the very concept of morality.

That's exactly why he's so hard to beat, and why his supporters won't flinch no matter how ugly his approval numbers get. (They haven't budged, by the way — but that's a separate topic.)

Trump’s opponents run on moral certainty that he's the villain: remove him, defeat him, shame him. He runs on moral certainty that the mullahs and the IRGC, Palestinian militant factions, and Communist movements are the villains — and that defeating them is the point. Set those side by side, and it’s clear Trump’s position is driven by conviction. The left’s constant whining sounds like a grudge wearing a suit.

That gap hands ammunition to every conservative who's ever argued that liberals traded real conviction for something cheaper: distaste. Distaste doesn't demand courage. Distaste doesn't require a plan. It just needs someone disliked loudly enough, for long enough, that the dislike starts masquerading as principle. They’ve been doing it so long, it’s all they’ve got left, and it shows. All they have left after so long of it being the core argument is stubbornness and hatred. And that’s never going to sell.

It's one reason I remain confident regarding the mid-terms, assuming the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (also called the SAVE Act or SAVE America Act) is passed.

Maybe someone ought to get John Thune to read this piece.

Thought of the day: Inspiration doesn't exist until you're working.

VIP members: Let's hear your comments. And hit that heart.

Have a great day today, gang. Have that BBQ, have that ice cream. Smile today. Don't let the day slip by you. I'll see you tomorrow.

https://pjmedia.com/eric-florack/2026/07/05/conviction-vs-contempt-why-the-left-cant-match-trumps-moral-clarity-n4954686

Nancy Pelosi's Husband Was Just Caught in an Alleged Hit-and-Run; Will He Skate Accountability?

Paul Pelosi, the husband of former Speaker of the House and Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA-11), is in the crosshairs of law enforcement... again

Representative Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul, has been charged with a misdemeanor after an alleged hit-and-run in the same spot he got one four years ago. 

Paul, 86, has been accused of crashing into an unoccupied parked car on the shoulder of a roadway just after 2.30pm in Yountville, a small town in the Wine Country of California, on Thursday. 

He was driving close to the palatial vineyard estate he shares with Speaker Emeritus Nancy in tony St Helena when he smashed into a parked car.

Cops say, rather than stopping, Paul continued to drive his brown convertible until it shuddered to a halt and blocked an intersection – the exact spot he previously got a DUI in 2022. 

Yountville is a very small community, so the antics, including the drunk driving incidents, of Paul Pelosi are well known. As is the fact that, thanks to his high-profile and powerful wife, the majority of them have probably been swept under the rug.

The last time Paul Pelosi made headlines was in 2022, first because of a DUI where Pelosi crashed his Porsche and collided with another driver. Pelosi was arrested and booked on charges of driving while intoxicated. He pleaded guilty, and a Napa County judge sentenced him to three years of probation. In October 2022, Pelosi was attacked with a hammer by leftwing activist David DePape at the Pelosi's Napa home. Pelosi suffered a brain injury, which required surgery and hospitalization. Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat cadre tried to blame the incident on Republicans and rightwing violence. 

DePape was sentenced to 30 years in prison for his crime.

The Daily Mail story linked above also mentions a 1957 incident when Pelosi was only 16. Pelosi was driving too fast, and flipped his sports car, killing his older brother David.

A newspaper report at the time said Paul would be cited for misdemeanor manslaughter. In the end, there was no court case, and he was exonerated by a coroner's jury.

His brother had urged him to drive slower before the fatal smash, according to a patrolman quoted by the San Francisco Examiner. 

But on this July 3 crash, Pelosi did not bother to stop after hitting the parked vehicle. He simply went on his way.

In a police interview, Paul said he knew he had hit something but didn’t know what, so he continued driving until his car puttered out. 

'He drove until his car became disabled and was no longer able to continue driving,' the Napa Valley Police Department said. 

Napa Valley police sources told the Daily Mail that his car sustained severe damage to the front right, while the empty car he hit was left needing serious repairs to the back. 

Authorities identified the vehicle's license plate as Paul Pelosi's. He is now facing a single charge of hit-and-run on a parked car and will have his driving license referred to the DMV for re-evaluation due to his age, which is common for elderly drivers.

The Pelosis can obviously pay for any damages to the other person's destroyed vehicle. Thankfully, no one was hurt in the incident, and while Pelosi may get another slap on the wrist, he possibly will lose his ability to hold a driver's license. Why he still had one after suffering his brain injury in 2022 is a question for another day.

It would be nice to one day see some accountability enacted on this corrupt house. Nancy Pelosi's power has been diminished of late, and she no longer holds the sway she once had. So, perhaps that will happen sooner rather than later. 

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2026/07/04/nancy-pelosis-husband-in-legal-crosshairs-will-he-skate-or-are-her-golden-connections-still-working-n2204004

REP MARIO DIAZ-BALART: We are stopping Cuba from trafficking doctors for profit

Several nations are cutting Cuban doctor programs as Congress targets aid for nations that are involved


A new law authored by me and passed by Congress in February 2026 punishes countries that are complicit in the human trafficking of Cuban doctors by way of the Castro regime’s medical missions abroad. The same law for the fiscal year 2027 is expected to be voted on in the House soon.

For decades, the Cuban dictatorship has made billions by coercing its medical professionals to work in places no one wants to go, under the worst labor conditions. 

But the doctors themselves see very little of that money. The regime on the island earns an estimated $4-8 billion per year from the program, and regime operatives keep 75-95% of what the doctors are paid.

The U.S. State Department says the regime confiscates the doctors’ passports, forces their families to stay in Cuba as leverage, assigns handlers to watch them and punishes families if a doctor defects. 

Cuba medical missions

A picture shows Cuban embroidery on the white coat of a member of a delegation of Cuban doctors after their arrival at the Martinique-Aime-Cesaire airport in Le Lamentin, on the French Caribbean island of Martinique on June 26, 2020. 

Since 2010, State Department reports have called the program exploitative. Appropriately, State labeled the practice "human trafficking" or "forced labor" run by the Cuban regime in 2020.

A new provision in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 targets countries that pay the authoritarian dictatorship for these exploited medical workers. The State Department must now list every country or group that pays for these personnel and notify them they’re on the list. 

If a country stays on the list for two years in a row, it loses all U.S. foreign aid. Foreign officials involved can be banned from entering the United States, and their finances and property here may also be frozen.

The law is already obtaining results. Guatemala, Jamaica, Guyana, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Paraguay and Honduras are reducing or outright ending their use of Cuban doctors. 

Some, like the Bahamas, are changing terms by trying to pay doctors directly instead of paying the regime – something the dictatorship has rejected before. Consequently, the Trump administration has enforced this law by imposing visa restrictions on officials from Brazil, Grenada and some African countries tied to the program.

This legislation ensures accountability, something that past Democratic administrations were willing to overlook. It exposes those who benefit from the program and hits them with real punitive consequences: the loss of U.S. aid, travel bans and financial sanctions. The law also strongly supports the oppressed Cuban people by protecting Cuban doctors from exploitation and abuse, while cutting off a critical financial lifeline to the regime.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/rep-mario-diaz-balart-we-stopping-cuba-from-trafficking-doctors-profit

Saturday, July 4, 2026

America Did Not Have an Easy Birth


Two-hundred-fifty years ago, the Second Continental Congress lit the fuse for human freedom by declaring the United States of America independent from Great Britain. Although we Americans celebrate the Fourth of July as our nation’s birthday, our country did not have an easy birth.

In July 1776, the men who became known as our “Founding Fathers” had many problems. First among them was the reality that not everyone believed the United Colonies of North America (as they were then called) should sever ties with the Crown. During the First Continental Congress, convened in Philadelphia for fewer than two months in the early autumn of 1774, delegates from twelve of the thirteen colonies (Loyalist Georgia did not attend.) could not agree how best to respond to Britain’s naval blockade of Boston Harbor and Parliament’s imposition of the Intolerable Acts as collective punishment for the Boston Tea Party.

Staunch Loyalist and Pennsylvania delegate Joseph Galloway even proposed a Plan of Union to formally unite Great Britain and the North American colonies. That did not sit well with Massachusetts firebrand Samuel Adams, and the proposal was eventually struck from the official record of the proceedings.

Following the April 19, 1775, Battles of Lexington and Concord — the first armed conflicts in America’s War for Independence — colonial delegates reconvened in Philadelphia on May 10. For the next fourteen months, the Second Continental Congress debated what to do next. Formal separation from Great Britain remained a contentious issue. Even after fighting in Massachusetts had begun, most American colonists resisted calls for independence throughout 1775.

However, public support for the cause of liberty grew as Christian ministers exhorted members of their congregations to recognize the fight against political tyranny as a struggle for God-given rights and a duty to pursue His will (and our happiness) here on Earth. Patriots of Massachusetts and Virginia worked tirelessly to shift public sentiment throughout the colonies and to persuade each colony’s representatives that the time for revolution had arrived.

Then an anonymously authored forty-seven-page essay was published in Philadelphia on January 10, 1776. Written by Thomas Paine and “Addressed to the Inhabitants of America,” its title was simple: Common Sense. Described by recently deceased historian Gordon Wood as “the most incendiary and popular pamphlet of the entire revolutionary era,” it remains the best-selling American work of all time.

In the first half of 1776, American colonists read aloud from its pages in taverns and secret meeting places while British soldiers passed on nearby streets. Colonial sentiment quickly transformed from hopes for reconciliation with Britain to fervent cries for independence. Paine ignited in Protestant Christians a passion that united the colonies in a righteous war for freedom against the Crown.

After the Virginia Convention then meeting in Williamsburg instructed its delegates to the Continental Congress to push for independence, Richard Henry Lee proposed this motion in Philadelphia on June 7: “Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.” A year of back-and-forth debate was finally brought to a head.

Although the mood among delegates to the Second Continental Congress had shifted toward general acceptance that a war against Britain was inevitable, unanimity was far from certain. The colonial governments of Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina had not authorized their delegates to vote for independence. Lee’s resolution was therefore tabled for three weeks, so that delegates could return home and make the case for a formal declaration of independence.

After a “trial vote” on July 1 indicated that South Carolina and Pennsylvania would vote against Lee’s resolution and that Delaware’s vote was split between two delegates present in Philadelphia, South Carolina’s Edward Rutledge requested that the official vote be postponed until the following day.

What happened next is the part of history that often gets left out of textbooks. Between Monday and Tuesday, Benjamin Franklin strongly suggested to two of his fellow Pennsylvania delegates that they be absent for the final vote. Rutledge managed to convince South Carolina’s delegates to flip in favor of independence.

Meanwhile, Delaware’s pro-independence delegate, Thomas McKean, had already dispatched an urgent letter to Caesar Rodney, Delaware’s third delegate to the Continental Congress and a consummate patriot in favor of independence. Rodney was eighty miles away in Kent County training Delaware’s militia and providing General George Washington’s Continental Army with needed supplies. He was also suffering from a serious facial cancer that took his life eight years later at the age of fifty-five.

McKean’s letter arrived in Dover on Monday, July 1. Rodney, realizing that he was the tie-breaking vote for Delaware, did not hesitate. Disregarding warnings from the physicians treating his cancer, he mounted his horse and took off. Through thunderstorms and lightning, Rodney rode through the night over poor roads and across wild terrain. Stopping only once to change horses, he made it to Philadelphia in eighteen hours, a trip that normally required two full days.

Just as the voting in Philadelphia began, delegates heard heavy hoofbeats on the cobblestone outside of the Pennsylvania State House (now Independence Hall). Exhausted, still in his riding clothes with spurs attached, covered in mud, and wearing a green silk scarf around his cancer-ridden face, Rodney strode in and took his seat.

“As I believe the voice of my constituents and all sensible and honest men is in favor of independence,” Rodney announced, “and as my own judgment concurs with them, I give my vote for independence.” His fateful ride secured Delaware’s vote for the cause of liberty. (Next time you find a Delaware state quarter in your pocket, take a look at the man riding on a galloping horse; that’s Caesar Rodney!)

Virginian Richard Henry Lee’s resolution for independence secured support from twelve of the thirteen colonies, with New York’s delegates abstaining from the vote as they still lacked formal approval from their colonial government (an error remedied seven days later when it voted tardily to “join with the other colonies in supporting” independence).

Unanimity among the colonies was important. It deprived the British of the opportunity to exploit colonial divisions. It also demonstrated to the American people that the colonies were united in purpose. The history of the War for Independence could have been much different had the delegates to the Second Continental Congress not found a way to come together.

The Pennsylvania Evening Post reported on July 2: “This day the CONTINENTAL CONGRESS declared the UNITED COLONIES FREE and INDEPENDENT STATES.”

John Adams wrote to his wife, Abigail: “The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever more.”

The American people, on the other hand, immediately recognized July 4 — the date the Declaration of Independence was unanimously ratified and first published by a local printer — as America’s Independence Day.

The delegates to the Second Continental Congress committed acts of high treason against the Crown — crimes punishable by torture and death. We Americans celebrate their treason every year on this day.

Our country was birthed in adversity, nourished on liberty, christened as the land of opportunity, guided by God, and preserved by His blessings. Two-hundred-fifty years later, let us pray for two-hundred-fifty more. Happy Independence Day!

Hat tip to John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, who died two hundred years ago today!

https://patriot.tv/america-did-not-have-an-easy-birth/

HHS, Gates Foundation Fund U.S.-Wuhan Team to Engineer Virus Designed to Edit Human DNA: Journal 'Molecular Therapy'

American tax dollars finance human body-altering pathogens in collaboration with Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists.




The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation helped fund a U.S.-Wuhan research team that engineered an adenovirus designed to deliver DNA-editing machinery into human blood-forming stem cells, according to a study published July 1 in Molecular Therapy.

The stated purpose of the study was to genetically engineer human stem cells to resist HIV infection.

But the experiments raise broader questions about the risks of funding purported viral systems designed to permanently alter the human body.

The research was funded by multiple National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants under HHS, grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and support from biotechnology company Ensoma Bio.

The author affiliations include the University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, and the State Key Laboratory of Virology and Biosafety at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The study acknowledges support from NIH grants R01HL128288, R01AI174304, K08AI183990, and R01HL141781, along with grants INV-017692 and INV-038139 from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Additional support came from China’s Prevention and Control of Emerging and Major Infectious Diseases–National Science and Technology Major Project and Ensoma Bio.




According to the paper, the researchers claim to have engineered modified helper-dependent adenoviral (HDAd) vectors to carry CRISPR-derived base editors programmed to alter the human CCR5 gene.

Rather than editing cells outside the body before transplanting them back into a patient, the researchers say they designed the adenovirus to deliver the gene-editing machinery directly into blood-forming stem cells inside a living subject.

Hematopoietic stem cells continually produce new blood and immune cells throughout a person’s life.

By altering the DNA of those stem cells, the researchers say they sought to create a continuing supply of immune cells lacking a functional CCR5 receptor, which HIV is said to commonly use to infect cells.

The study claims that the engineered adenovirus produced “near-complete target site editing” in an HIV-permissive cell line.

The researchers also reported efficient editing in human CD34+ blood-forming stem cells obtained from mobilized donors and umbilical cord blood.

The experiments extended beyond laboratory cell cultures.

Researchers injected the engineered adenoviral vector into humanized mice, enriched the purportedly genetically modified cells, and then exposed the animals to HIV.

According to the paper, approximately 50% of the targeted CCR5 sites were edited in bone marrow cells, and the treated animals had roughly 12-fold lower HIV plasma titers than untreated controls following HIV challenge.

The paper describes the work as part of a broader effort to move human gene editing from ex vivo procedures—where cells are removed, genetically modified, and reinfused—to in vivo editing performed directly inside the body using purported viral delivery systems.

The researchers write that helper-dependent adenoviral vectors can carry large genetic payloads, be manufactured at relatively low cost, and be adapted to deliver different genome-editing systems into hematopoietic stem cells

Bottom Line

American taxpayer dollars and Gates Foundation funding helped finance a U.S.-Wuhan collaboration that engineered a virus to carry purportedly human DNA-editing machinery into living cells.

The study illustrates continued government investment in purported viral delivery systems designed to make permanent changes inside the body.

You can contact NIAID here, NIH here, and HHS here to voice opposition to taxpayer-funded research on pathogens—particularly after Congress, the White House, the Department of Energy, the FBI, the CIA, and Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) all acknowledged that the COVID-19 pandemic was “likely” the result of a laboratory incident involving engineered pathogens.

Sorry, blackpillers, you got it wrong again…

There’s a certain kind of commentator or X user who could watch ICE haul in 10,000 people in five days and still complain that somebody used the wrong font on the press release.
You know the type. Everything is a betrayal, nothing is happening, Trump is getting rickrolled, the courts ruined everything, the swamp always wins, the whole thing is over before it even starts.

Except, no, that’s not what’s happening.

The latest numbers tell a very different story. ICE arrests are surging. The daily arrest rate has doubled, and Team Trump will be ramping up the enforcement push conservatives have been demanding for eons.

That doesn’t mean every problem is solved, but Biden’s border disaster was horrific. The invasion, activist judges, sanctuary states, and now, the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship fiasco will not disappear in one clean sweep.

But the blackpill routine is getting old.

Because the truth is, the enforcement push and the deportation numbers are impressive. And more good news is that worksite operations appear to be on the table.

And now, the next big fight is figuring out how to hit the anchor-baby and birth-tourism racket from another angle after the court’s horrific ruling.

The first sign of better things to come is from The New York Times, of all places.

NYT is now confirming that ICE has doubled its daily arrest rate, with arrests reportedly topping 2,000 migrants a day.

NYT confirms that ICE has doubled its daily arrest rate, with a fraction of the protests and none of the drama, outpacing the records set by Noem.

Immigration enforcement has been arresting over 2,000 migrants a day, or more considering other work in the interior under Mullin.


Here’s a closeup of the image:



This is definitely something, no matter how badly doomers want it to be nothing.

And according to Fox News, there’s a very specific reason this ramp-up is happening now.

The agency is using funding from Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” to pull this off.

This makes the American people happy… fund the mission, use the tools, and turn campaign promises into reality.

A source familiar with ICE operations said the agency is currently ramping up operations using funds from the One Big Beautiful Bill as the passage of the legislation nears its one-year anniversary.

Blackpillers have acted like nothing meaningful could happen unless every immigration problem disappeared overnight. But unfortunately, that’s not how our government works. But when the admin gets the money, the numbers start to move in the right direction.

And The New York Times is now reporting just how much those numbers are moving.

Federal immigration officials have detained more than 10,000 people in five days, and agency leaders have reportedly ordered top ICE officials to focus more of their officers’ efforts on picking up immigrants they want to deport.

Federal immigration officials have detained more than 10,000 people in the last five days, a major surge that has stemmed from a push within Immigration and Customs Enforcement to increase arrest rates.

Agency leaders in recent days ordered top ICE officials to focus more of their officers’ efforts on picking up immigrants they want to deport, according to documents obtained by The New York Times and interviews with federal officials. ICE officers have arrested people at check-ins with immigration authorities, during traffic stops and on the street. The push has apparently yielded results, with recent arrest numbers roughly doubling from the 1,000 picked up each day earlier this year.

ICE officials were told that the White House wanted an increase in arrests, according to three officials with knowledge of the conversations. One of the officials said that it was unclear how long the pace could continue, but that ICE officials had been told that 2,000 arrests a day was the new standard for enforcement.

The White House wanted more arrests, so ICE was told to increase the pace. Ice officers were told to focus more on people the government wants to deport. The good news is that 2,000 arrests a day is now the new standard for enforcement.

So yes, something big is happening.

Because after years of open-border insanity, we can’t pretend the country can dig out overnight. But when federal immigration officials detain more than 10,000 people in five days and the daily arrest rate pretty much doubles, that’s something to celebrate.

And now Team Trump is ready to push even harder on one of the biggest issues driving illegal immigration: work.

CNN says Trump is planning to increase worksite immigration enforcement operations. This is something MAGA voters have been wanting to see, because the jobs magnet is the biggest incentive. If Team Trump can get these illegals at the worksite, that’s a huge win for the American people.

The Trump administration is planning for an increase in worksite immigration enforcement operations, with multiple federal agencies involved in determining how to boost the number of arrests and placate the president’s base, according to five sources familiar with the discussions.

Administration officials say that criminal investigations have been ongoing and that any additional enforcement measures would stem from those probes. A Homeland Security spokesperson told CNN there has been an “increase in criminal investigations targeting fraud.”

The internal effort comes as the administration has tried to balance carrying out a historic number of deportations without agitating key industries — from manufacturing to construction to agriculture — or unsettling a fragile economy.

Worksite enforcement is where immigration policy gets real, fast. You crack down on that, and the entire incentive structure falls apart. Team Trump is looking at expanded worksite operations, and DHS is pointing to more criminal investigations targeting fraud, so that means the pressure campaign is ramping up, big time.

And that brings us to the next big fight: birthright citizenship.

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling created a separate mess that requires a serious workaround.

After the court’s ghastly decision, the right might need to switch focus and plug these loopholes.

There’s a popular X post making the rounds. It lays out a bold idea. If foreign nationals want to game American citizenship for future access to the country, the answer should be simple: shut off the access.

Dear @VP @JDVance, I was honored to see you endorse my idea of prohibiting birth tourism citizenship in U.S. Territories (which China has exploited to the hilt), and I’d like to offer you some even bolder ideas to save our national sovereignty.

So far, solutions to the Anchor Baby problem have focused on the “anchors,” but the SCOTUS decision requires renewing focus on the “boats” they tether and ending their incentives to give birth here. Here’s how.

Take all the conditions in the original Trump EO and direct all the consequences onto foreigners who exploit “loophole citizenship” by declaring them PERSONA NON GRATA.

Specifically, if an alien without legal permanent residency chooses to have a child on U.S. soil, the foreigner parents must either renounce the child’s American citizenship or lose the ability to ever again legally step foot in the U.S., their choice.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)), the President has broad power to suspend or restrict entry of any class of foreign nationals the President determines would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” The President should use this authority to deem such foreigners:

permanently ineligible for U.S. entry under any visa type (whether visitor, student, work, or otherwise)
permanently ineligible to petition for asylum, refugee, or temporary protected status
permanently ineligible for lottery or family based entry
permanently ineligible to petition for any legal residency or U.S. citizenship whatsover, including by future marriage to an American citizen.
Foreigners cynically use their children as tools to get lawful access to the U.S., its resources, and its opportunities that were paid for in blood and treasure by generations of Americans that came before. Forever shut the door to that access and birth tourism would plummet overnight.

But what about the people who would defy any ban or are already here illegally? That’s a tougher problem, but still addressable. The lawbreakers would have know that if they exploit “loophole citizenship” and choose not to renounce their child’s U.S. citizenship, they will have automatically moved themselves up on the deportation tracking and priority list.

The president can also exercise his discretion under the INA to strip away common procedural tools immigration lawyers use to delay or withhold removal and can require expedited deportation once they are caught as we currently do with repeat offenders and criminals.

Congress, for its part, should codify these changes to prevent any potential future open borders President from unilaterally undoing them. It may also need to create mechanisms for a parent covered by the EO to be able to renounce their child’s American citizenship as an exercise of their parental rights, especially in cases of truly accidental births on U.S. soil.

States too have a role to play in limiting perverse incentives. For example, they can require parents who are here illegally to pay for the public schooling of their children, whether U.S. citizen or not (and thereby prompt the court to revisit the wrongly decided Plyler v. Doe decision of 1982).

People are furious because the biggest court rewrite of the Constitution since Obergefell has placed our national identity at the mercy of foreigners making decisions according to THEIR interests, on THEIR timing, and on THEIR terms.

In the American system of government, for every egregious SCOTUS decision, there should be an equal and opposite reaction from the other federal branches, the states, and the People. It’s how our system is designed, and we should exercise that power to make sure it is Americans, and only Americans, who decide who can join our great nation.

We need this type of smart, clever thinking, not doom and gloom.

We all can see that the left built an immigration system around freebies. Come here, stay, delay removal, exploit loopholes, hire lawyers, drag out the process, and eventually dare the country to do anything about it. Birthright citizenship became one of the biggest incentives of all, especially when foreign nationals realized a child born on US soil could become a permanent ball and chain to the country.

The idea in the X post flips the script and puts pressure back where it belongs. If foreign parents are using American soil as a loophole, then the consequences should fall on the people who are actually gaming the system. Cut off future entry, petitions, and all the rewards. Make the racket way more expensive and difficult than it’s worth.

That’s how a sovereign nation is supposed to think when the Supreme Court screws us over.

The blackpillers can keep whining if they want. At this point, it’s practically a lifestyle brand.

But actual facts are promising… ICE arrests are surging, the White House wants more, worksite enforcement is coming, fraud investigations are ramping up, and the right is already looking for new ways to fight back after the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship disaster.

No, the job isn’t finished. But the push and momentum are very real.

This doesn’t look like some sad surrender…

'Little Commie BAST**D' Zohran Mamdani Tries Backpedaling on His 'America Sucks' July 4 Speech and HOOBOY

New York City’s socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani, tried to play nice on the Fourth of July with a post that suddenly discovered the word ...