Leader Thune just announced that the Senate will vote this week on Voter ID, which is part of the SAVE America Act and is very popular among Americans. The same bill will also include a ban on insider trading for Congress.
Here’s what he said:
A site for Conservatives to discuss News.
Leader Thune just announced that the Senate will vote this week on Voter ID, which is part of the SAVE America Act and is very popular among Americans. The same bill will also include a ban on insider trading for Congress.
Here’s what he said:
Some sheriffs have sued their own states for jeopardizing safety by ignoring immigration laws, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) said during an appearance on Breitbart News Daily.
Jordan spoke about the angel families who have testified before his committee, discussing the dangers of sanctuary jurisdictions that Democrats love and embrace.
“We do know of all the angel families in sanctuary jurisdictions where some illegal migrant who has been charged with another crime is let out and then goes and does something terrible. We’ve had angel family after angel family come and testify in front of our committee. We were — every week, we were in session, we were doing a hearing on this because I believe this is such a stupid policy,” Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said, putting this in greater perspective.
“And again, remember, 18 big blue cities, 11 big blue states, three counties like Fairfax County, Arlington County, right there next to D.C. and the District of Columbia, all sanctuary jurisdictions. That’s almost a third of the nation,” he said. “The population lives in those areas… it’s just dumb. Why would you jeopardize — that’s why we have sheriffs, county sheriffs, suing their state. If they’re in a sanctuary — we had a sheriff from Maryland who’s suing the state of Maryland, saying, ‘This is not good,'” he said, paraphrasing the position of the sheriff. “‘I was elected to protect the people in my county. This jeopardizes their safety.'”
Jordan said there is a sheriff in New York who did the same thing and said Republicans need to zone in on this ahead of the midterms.
He continued, “We’ve had two of them testify suing their state, and I asked them, I just asked them the basic question. I go, ‘Why suing your state? That’s a big step. You’re a county sheriff. You’re suing your own darn state.’ And…they go, ‘Because it jeopardizes the safety of our people.'”
“They’re elected as the top law enforcement agent in their county, and they see how dumb, just dumb this is. That’s why they’re doing it,” he added.
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2026/09/29/exclusive-rep-jim-jordan-sheriffs-are-suing-their-own-states-over-sanctuary-policies-jeopardizing-safety/I haven’t covered Robin Bullock in a while, so it’s time to circle back around to him.
Remember “Circle Back Psaki”?
That was about the same time as I was covering Robin Bullock a lot, and we might have to start doing it again.
Because I found this clip to be absolutely fascinating and fantastic!
He doesn’t guarantee President Trump will have a third term, but Bullock gave a prophetic word in this message claiming it’s his if he wants it.
And….you know he wants it!
Watch right here:
FULL TRANSCRIPT:
Speaker 1: What was the other word you’ve given recently which referenced a third term? Do you know that from memory somewhat? I remember when the Lord said this.
Speaker 2: I think I told it here.
Speaker 1: I think you did. I just can’t remember the details.
Speaker 2: And he said this: he said Trump is getting ready to leave for his next assignment, unless he chooses a third term. “I promised it to him if he wanted it.”
Speaker 1: Well, what did you think about that about three or four weeks ago when he said, “I’m going to run for 2028”? And the question was, was he just messing with our heads? Then he put that cap on, and then he put a meme out on his own sites for 2028. I kind of think he wants it.
Speaker 2: Oh, no, he wasn’t just kidding around. That’s what I think. Oh, he was messing with people. But, you know, that came out right after I gave that word. I gave that word first here, and then I think the second time on Flyover, and then he came out and did that because they sent me a video.
Speaker 1: Well, he either heard you or he heard the Lord.
Speaker 2: I believe he heard the Lord. That’s what he heard. But the Lord said he’s about ready to leave for his next assignment unless he chooses a third term, and “I promised it to him.”
Speaker 1: So, I mean, I would have been curious about the next assignment, but I don’t care if he stays, you know, because he’s just getting warmed up. Even if he gets two more years with the full Congress, he could accomplish more in two years than most people accomplish in their lifetime. But what if he had two years plus four more years?
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1: You know, it’d be all over for the deep state forever, basically.
Speaker 2: Yeah. You need to pray, because a prophecy always comes down to choice. You know, there can be a prophetic word given to you, and it’s up to you to choose that. You can choose it or you can not. Remember I used to say if Trump chooses to run again, and then remember when he finally came out and he said, “I wasn’t going to”? He had to choose.
Speaker 1: He did say that. I remember that.
Speaker 2: It’s—you know—and we have offered him, I think, of course he had a certain central group of us, meaning probably a few million, who said we want him no matter what. But so many believers just got discouraged and said, “Oh, forget it, you know, he let us down,” and they turned against him, which was the stupidest thing I could ever imagine. Why would you turn against somebody because they stole it from him? How could you turn against him for that? But they did, you know, and yet he still decided to fight back anyway, even with that.
Speaker 1: So, well, it shows you he did it for more than himself.
Speaker 2: It does show that: more than himself. Yeah. He’s following the plan of God, and he doesn’t even realize it. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I want to bring this up too, and then there’s a longer video that’s four minutes. I think we should play it after this because I haven’t even seen it, but sometimes we don’t get those in. We sat off the air, and it’s fun what we talked about, but Trump came out yesterday—I think—isn’t he doing this convention tonight? Is that tonight, this Republican convention, or was that last night? When did he do this? Does anybody know? Somebody type that in there. It was either last night or it’s tonight.
He’s doing a unique Republican convention. Nobody’s typing, nobody knows. But anyway, he said last night at one of those—what do you call them? Okay, when he goes and they fill up a stadium, I can’t remember what it’s called, but he said if the people will vote and give him the House this time, he said, “If you win me the House this time, I will give every US citizen $5,000.” And he’s not lying. I mean, he means that. So what do you think about that? I heard one guy say, “Well, I don’t know if it’s legal, but I hope he does it.”
Speaker 2: I have no idea if it’s legal. I hope it’s legal, but you know, I don’t mind if he throws a little carrot out there for people to get out there and vote, you know.
Speaker 1: Well, the corruption money that Elon Musk uncovered is probably more than enough to cover that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah. It’s probably more than enough.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Musk has uncovered—what we know about is a couple hundred billion, but it’s probably true. That’s enough to cover that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, for sure. For sure.
Speaker 1: Well, and the guy that I heard talking about it—he wasn’t a known name that people would know, but he said that would put about $1.5 trillion into the economy if or when he did it. But he’s been building this sovereign wealth fund, and nobody’s ever talked about a sovereign wealth fund for this nation in my lifetime. I mean, that’s brilliant. Unless I missed it, a lot of people over the years hadn’t even thought about this nation first.
Speaker 2: Yeah. You know, they haven’t put the nation first. Yeah. It’s all what they can get out of it.
Speaker 1: Well, I have full confidence that he’s going to win this next one whether he bribes them to vote or not.
Speaker 2: Oh, he’d win. Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: He’s not done exposing the left and all that. I just wanted to know your thoughts on that. But no, that’s right.
But….how could he actually get a third term?
Well, for one, nothing is impossible for God. So there’s that.
And two, here’s exactly how I see it happening:
Here’s Exactly How I Predict President Trump Will Get His Third (Fourth?) Term…
We’ve been talking a LOT about a potential third (or would that be “fourth”?) term for President Trump this week.
Yesterday I brought you this:
President Trump Follows Up, Confirms He’s “Not Joking” About A Third (Fourth?) Term
Now today we had this breakdown on legal options for how it could happen:
What I want to do right now is break down exactly how I think this could actually happen.
This is one of those articles you might want to bookmark and save, or maybe even print out. I am going to do the same. Because I have a feeling we might just be looking back on this in 2027 and 2028 and be stunned to see it play out before your very eyes.
I want to be clear, this is pure (educated) speculation on my part. Entirely speculation, but I cover these things for a living. I live in this world and I feel like I have gotten to know President Trump very well over the past 10 years. I know how he thinks and I know how he works.
So here is my pure speculation on how I think this could play out and how I believe it’s not far-fetched at all to believe President Trump could waltz into a third term.
First, I’ll tell you what I don’t think is an option.
I don’t think parsing words in the 22nd Amendment is an option.
There’s a lot of speculation going around out there saying Trump’s attorneys are parsing the language in the 22nd Amendment and focusing on the word “elected”.
The wording of the 22nd Amendment is actually quite clear and straight-forward.
Here it is:
Amendment XXII
Passed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951.Section 1.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.Section 2.
This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.
Some people claim a workaround would be that JD Vance would run and Trump would be his Vice President and then JD Vance, once elected, would step down and Trump would take office by succession, not by “being elected”.
I think that’s extremely flimsy and quite frankly just noise to distract people.
I don’t buy it.
Mainly because the 12th Amendment expressly prohibits exactly that scenario, key part again in red:
Amendment XII
Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804.The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate.
The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; the person having the greatest number of votes for President shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.
And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.
The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice.
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
So I think that’s all just noise, designed to get people off track. Sleight of hand, if you will.
What I actually think will happen is much simpler.
The cleanest and most fool-proof way to get this done is to simply Amend or Revoke the 22nd Amendment.
There’s no serious legal argument that that wouldn’t work. There’s a process for it. We’ve used that process 27 times to create 27 Amendments to the Constitution. It works and it’s available.
In fact, the last one is not that old, being passed in 1992.
The problem here becomes the fact that it’s extremely unlikely in our divided modern day Congress, because Step 1 is a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, which is extremely difficult right now.
And then step 2 is approval from three-fourths of the state legislatures (currently 38 out of 50 states).
So you can see the challenge.
This is where I see the grand plan come into play….
I have always believed that President Trump and team caught the 2020 election steal in real time. I believe that data is safely stored, either with Space Force or somewhere else.
I believe President Trump knew he needed to win 2024 organically, the real way, with such a big win that no one could question it.
I believe he knew that trying to release the data on the 2020 steal too early would have fractured our country, so that’s why he hasn’t disclosed it yet.
And quite frankly, even now our country is still quite divided.
But….imagine in 2026, 2027 or even 2028 if the IRS has been shut down, the Country is roaring again, all the violent migrants have been deported, America is healing, people are happy again, our food has been made safe again thanks to RFK and we literally think and feel better because we’re no longer eating toxins, our country is rich again, we have Bitcoin and crypto reserves, we have a Strategic Opportunity Fund making money for Americans and maybe instead of making your annual April 15th payment to the IRS, maybe we all get a dividend check from the Opportunity Fund?
Imagine THAT reality.
Imagine a reality where even his haters have to say they’ve never seen America so strong.
We are seeing the earliest of inklings of that happening with things like Bill Maher having dinner with President Trump at the White House.
Folks, it’s possible…I can see it! I can see it in my mind very clearly.
Now….imagine we’re living in that reality and President Trump comes on TV suddenly one day to hold an emergency press conference.
“My fellow Americans….”
And then he rolls it all out. The evidence of the 2020 steal. Clear as day. Irrefutable. America is stunned as the reality sets in. All of the information is sourced, verified and posted online for all to inspect.
In the following days, his toughest critics examine it only to find it’s clear and indisputable.
And then the reality sets in….
People start to piece it all together in their heads. He’s had this in his back pocket since 2020! He didn’t try to stay in power or remove Joe Biden. He let the legal process play out. He didn’t want to send this country into a Civil War so he held it all back. He dodged an assassination, he dodged four lawfare cases, and he won 2024 fair and square. And now he’s literally saved America and made us prosperous again! Healthy again! Safe again! Rich again! Happy again!
That’s exactly the moment that I believe there will be such a strong groundswell of support of people saying “this man was cheated out of a term in 2020. He’s done more than any other President, probably even more than Lincoln and Washington. He deserves another term.”
I believe the people will also demand it of the politicians.
And that’s when I believe there will be such a groundswell of support that reaching those thresholds for a Constitutional Amendment will no longer look daunting.
I believe we will roll right through them and you’ll be looking at a new 28th Amendment and you’ll be looking at President Trump for 2028-2032.
Of course he’ll have to run again and win, but I think that will also be the time when you’ll see the first President to win all 50 states.
Ronald Reagan came close, winning 49 out of 50, but I think you’ll see the full 50/50 go red for Trump in 2028.
So there you go!
https://100percentfedup.com/robin-bullock-third-term-president-trump/
Pencil-neck Adam Schiff has never been accused of being a political genius, and he never will be.
On Tuesday, during former DOJ hitman Jack Smith’s testimony before the US Senate, California Senator Adam Schiff accidentally showed an image of the murder of Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland at the hands of police on the steps of the US Capitol on January 6.
Rosanne was the second woman murdered that day by police. The fake legacy news has never investigated her story.
But we have!
Rosanne Boyland was standing at the US Capitol when she was pushed down the steps by police. The police did not stop there, though. They then piled dozens of people on top of her.
Then Officer Lila Morris is seen beating Rosanne’s lifeless body on the steps to the US Capitol.
That is when protester Jake Lang dragged Rosanne away from the mush pile, and Trump supporters attempted to perform CPR.
The Trump supporters spent several minutes attempting to resuscitate Rosanne.
The Gateway Pundit posted exclusive footage of this horrible tragedy that the media to this day has refused to air
On Tuesday, Tommy Tatum posted this photo on his X page.
Tommy Tatum knows what he is talking about. Tommy was lying on the ground next to Rosanne as she was dying. He lives today to talk about it.
This was an American tragedy that the left hopes you will forget.
We will continue to speak out on this, hoping that one day there will be justice for Rosanne.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/oops-adam-schiff-accidentally-shows-image-murder-trump/
The Supreme Court is once again siding with President Trump on deportations of illegals to third-party countries. Attorney General Todd Blanche just released a statement on the ruling, which came down this afternoon.
Here’s what he wrote:
Now for the second time, SCOTUS just granted our stay in conducting all third-country removals of illegal aliens. Again, this is entirely lawful and a critical tool for immigration enforcement. Unlike the lower court, SCOTUS waited to hear from both sides before making the decision.Not only did the Supreme Court grant the stay, but it will now hear the case. And the top two lines of questioning it wants argued are whether the lower court in Massachusetts even had jurisdiction in the first place to issue this ruling, and then if it had the authority to issue classwide relief on the part of the plaintiffs.
https://therightscoop.com/big-breaking-supreme-court-sides-with-trump-again/
Some future doctor or engineer (I’m sure) decided it was a good decision to take a huge leak all over the lobby of a New York apartment building.
How charming!
You can see in the video he first looks for cameras and somehow misses the obvious one, then unzips and lets it fly.
The New York Post added that Amazon offered the customer a $50 gift card as a concession:
A barbaric Amazon delivery driver was caught on camera peeing all over the lobby of a posh Greenwich Village apartment building — leaving a resident pissed off over the “foul” delivery.
The disturbing footage captured by Donny, a 30-year-old tenant living in a four-story apartment near the corner of Bleecker Street and Carmine Avenue, showed the moment an Amazon delivery driver unzipped his pants outside of his apartment on Aug. 26 and started spraying urine in the halls and on furniture.
“He walked straight back there as if he’d done it a hundred times, like second nature,” Donny told The Post of the disgusting Ring footage.
“I had shoes in the hallway, a chair in the hallway, a table in the hallway and he was peeing and splashing everywhere,” the resident added.
The footage shows a man wearing a light blue-and-gray Amazon delivery driver uniform ring the electronic doorbell system at around 3 p.m. to gain entry into the building.
Donny, who wished to not be identified by his last name, buzzed the driver into the building and thought nothing was unusual — until he later checked footage on the Ring app and was shocked at what he saw.
The footage shows the deliveryman look around the hallway, presumably to check if the coast is clear before he unzips his pants and does his business all over Donny’s belongings.
When Donny reached out to Amazon to complain about the whiz, he said Amazon called it a “horrible” incident and dropped a mere $50 gift card as their way of saying sorry.
“I didn’t think that was appropriate for what had happened” Donny said. He refused the coupon, he added.
The Mary Sue reports that this is far from the first time this has happened:
One woman’s recent experience with an Amazon delivery driver went so poorly that it resulted in her calling the police—and a cleaning crew being hired.
What Went Wrong With This Amazon Delivery?
In a video with over 7.7 million views, TikTok user Eve Hoppe (@evehoppe) shows Ring camera footage of an Amazon driver making a delivery.After he drops off the package, he walks down the stairs. Then, he unzips his fly—and urinates all over the floor of Hoppe’s building.
“Amazon really said ‘special delivery,’” she writes in the video overlay text
https://wltreport.com/2026/09/29/sick-watch-as-delivery-driver-pees-all-over-apartment-lobby/What Happened Next?
In a follow-up video, Hoppe recounts what happened after she discovered the driver’s actions.
First, she says she immediately reported the issue to Amazon. Then, her mother reached out to the police. The police asked for her Ring camera footage; Hoppe obliged. In response, the police said they were going to “go look for” the man.
“I don’t really know what his plan was—like, if he was gonna arrest him, just talk to him,” she says. “I don’t know the details of that, but he definitely is getting fired.”
For Amazon’s part, Hoppe says that they gave her a gift card for the approximate value of her order. She states in a comment that this was equivalent to around $22.
Amazon also sent cleaners to scrub and sanitize the carpet.
“So, everything is all good,” Hoppe summarizes.
Has This Happened Before?
There are a surprising number of cases of Amazon drivers being caught urinating on customer property.In June 2024, an Amazon driver was caught peeing on a customer’s porch mid-delivery. Then, in September 2024, a California couple filmed what appeared to be an Amazon driver urinating on their car. Later, in May 2025, an Amazon driver urinated and defecated on two different properties in the Los Angeles area.
Why does this happen? It’s uncertain, but several drivers have alleged that they are not given enough time to use the bathroom and complete their route.
According to a November 2024 piece in LAist, one worker alleged that peeing in bottles was “incredibly common” amongst Amazon drivers. While drivers are given 15-minute breaks to use the bathroom, some report difficulty finding a restroom within this amount of time, or feeling the need to use the time to decompress rather than locate and use a toilet. Others claim that they were unable to use the 15-breaks altogether due to the demands of the job.
Leader Thune just announced that the Senate will vote this week on Voter ID, which is part of the SAVE America Act and is very popular amo...