Rudy Giuliani went from being “America’s Mayor” to being Public Enemy Number One.
Why?
It seems to me that it’s due to his close affiliation with President Trump.
And perhaps the Swamp saw how Rudy cleaned up New York City and they don’t want him cleaning up Washington, D.C.?
Just a guess.
But he’s been targeted and beaten down for years now and the hits keep coming…
Recently though, Rudy seems to now be fighting back.
He just posted this on X and almost no one is covering it….and that’s why you have us!
Take a look:
Yes, that’s his official account with 1.8M followers.
Screenshot here if the post gets taken down:
So he’s basically saying he has all the evidence to take down the Washington Press and the Obama Administration and the Democrat Party…..
Wow!
I can’t wait, let’s see it Rudy!
Let’s do this!
Is this like so many other things (Brunson Brothers Case, J6 Exonerations, 2020 Investigation) that have to wait until January 20th to break wide open?
Will we see Rudy unleashed beginning in 2025?
That’s my thought.
Until then, I suspect he’ll remain under heavy attcak.
Here’s the latest from CBS News on the asset forfeitures they are trying to push through:
Trump ally and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani got a tongue-lashing Thursday in federal court after missing a deadline to turn over valuables to two election workers he defamed, including one asset, a vintage Mercedes, that he took for a drive to vote in Florida. He owes the women, Ruby Freeman and daughter Wandrea Moss, millions in damages.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman, upon being informed that Giuliani is the only person named on a list of people who have knowledge of Giuliani’s assets — and that he wants his name removed — called the request “farcical.”
“My expectation is you’re going to answer that question truthfully and fully,” Liman said, adding that someone else “in the world” must have knowledge of Giuliani’s various assets.
Hearings in the matter were being conducted remotely, but Liman ordered Giuliani to appear Thursday in person after learning that Giuliani had not met his obligations to the two women. Lawyers for Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea Moss, said they went to Giuliani’s Manhattan apartment last week and discovered that it had been emptied out, frustrating their efforts to catalog and obtain his assets.
“That’s the one piece of property sitting here in Manhattan that can’t be moved. Everything else has been game playing,” said Aaron Nathan, a lawyer for Freeman and Moss.
“We’ve asked over and over where this stuff is, and the defendant has refused to answer,” Nathan said.
Kenneth Caruso, one of Giuliani’s lawyers, said some of the items are now in a storage facility in suburban Ronkonkoma, New York, and claimed Giuliani has “no control” of it.
Liman warned Caruso to “consider your words” about access to the storage facility, because it could end up the subject of a contempt hearing if Giuliani doesn’t turn over the property he owes.
A jury in December 2023 awarded the pair $148 million in damages for lies Giuliani spread about them after the 2020 presidential election. The massive award sent Giuliani into bankruptcy, and entitled the defamed women to much of what he owns.
Asked by a reporter after Thursday’s hearing if he regretted defaming Freeman and Moss, Giuliani exclaimed, “No!” He then denied defaming them.
Liman had given Giuliani until Oct. 29 to surrender a long list of possessions, including the Mercedes, two dozen high-end watches, a jersey signed by New York Yankees Hall of Famer Joe DiMaggio — long featured prominently above the fireplace in Giuliani’s $5 million apartment — as well as other furniture and sports memorabilia. The women are also entitled to some $2 million that Giuliani has said President-elect Trump’s 2020 campaign owes him.
In another tense moment, Caruso called it “vindictive” that Giuliani must turn over a watch that’s an heirloom previously owned by his grandfather. Liman raised his voice, saying “Oh, come on,” before pointing to other cases he hears regularly, such as people “who run bodegas and short their employees’ wages.”
I’m no attorney, but I was always under the impression that even if you get a judgment against someone, they don’t just have to “pay up”.
In fact, I was always under the impression that the judgment holder has the obligation to track down and seize your assets.
You know, using things like garnishments and levies and things like that.
I have never heard of someone having to voluntarily just turn over assets.
https://wltreport.com/2024/11/26/rudy-giuliani-strikes-back-vows-expose-massive-pay/
No comments:
Post a Comment