As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:
No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?
And the headline isn't any better:
Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...
More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.
The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.
In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?
At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.
Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.
Sick.
https://twitchy.com/sarahd/2023/07/21/nyt-headline-on-abortion-n2385613
No comments:
Post a Comment