After three official forensic examinations of the Mesa County electronic voting systems, the Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold—known for her tremendous financial campaign support from George Soros—has some serious explaining to do…but she has elite media to do that for her.
Griswold, a former Barack Obama activist, was one of the beneficiaries of the George Soros “Secretary of State Project,” the American non-profit, progressive 527 political action committee. They focused on electing “reform-minded progressive” Secretaries of State in battleground states, who typically oversee the election process. The Project was funded by George Soros and members of the Democracy Alliance.
Griswold 
The original intent in 2006 was to protect Obama by having control of secretary of state offices in five key states — Iowa, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico and Ohio. The initiative expanded and is a major reason President Trump is not in the White House today.
Among some of the Secretary of State offices who benefited by this Soros group are Michigan’s Jocelyn Benson, Arizona’s Katy Hobbs Pennsylvania’s Katherine Bookvar.
The first forensic report in Mesa County revealed that at least 29,000 election records had been deleted at the direction of Griswold.
The second Mesa audit exposed numerous system issues that could allow any computer in the world to connect to the voting system server, and 36 separate wireless networking devices in the voting system.
In the third report, there is undeniable evidence that vote counts were changed and manipulated. This audit revealed during early voting, someone randomly created a new election, reloaded ballots into the new election, and likely illegally changed the voters intent on thousands of ballots.
While the audits reveal an illegal voting system was involved, evidence now shows cover-up evidence of numerous serious crimes.
What has Griswold been doing about the illegal activity that she obviously knows more about?
She introduced a bill in the Colorado Senate that, among other flagrant and extreme attempts to seize election power from local election officials, would cause oversight of Colorado elections solely in the hands of her.
Griswold’s SB22- 153 bill is so atrocious that it would make it a crime for election officials to criticize how the state runs elections and bans public audits of elections.
She has used the power of left wing media to distort the narrative to condemn those involved in the audits. Here is just one example of the biased reporting:
__________________________
Griswold appointed Democratic coharts to various position to influence actions against those involved in the audits:
Runbeck and Williams
Among those was Wayne Williams, an El Paso City, Colorado Council member and Senior Advisor to Runbeck Election Systems.
Runbeck, a Phoenix, Arizona based ballot printing and election automation company, is highly suspected in election fraud across the U.S. READ MORE HERE.
Despite the controversy, Mesa County signed a new contract worth (at least in the $100,000 to $300,000 range) with Runbeck in July 2021.
Williams 
Runbeck
It was Williams who played the lead role in 2015 to force all Colorado counties to use Dominion election systems. Counties have sued Williams to opt out of using the suspect equipment.
Meanwhile, Griswold used her power as chief elections officer to remove Tina Peters (see below) as elections director, and then appointed former Mesa County Clerk and current Mesa County Treasurer Sheila Reiner to oversee the election.
The Mesa County Commissioners did not like that decision.
“There is an immediate need. An immediate need to counter what the Secretary of State is doing. Our position is she is out of her lane,” County Commissioner Scott McInnis declared at the time.
The bottom line is Griswold and her disciples apparently designed a way to cover-up evidence of the crimes committed in Mesa County, and to suppress citizen discovery of new evidence.
The third report was particularly troublesome for Griswold as it verified true illegal activity occurred in two different elections, revealing there was no “fluke” or “glitch.” There is no possible way this manipulation was an accident.
The multiple databases in the voting system show:
Ballot and ballot batch records were moved.
These records were changed, breaking the chain of evidence.
The vote count in Mesa County’s voting system is impossible to authenticate, or prove accurate, voiding the legal certification of Mesa’s election.
Election Fraud is Widespread
In a separate legal case, Griswold is suing the Elbert County Clerk and Recorder in a frantic attempt to seize hard drives containing election record backups. Colorado County Clerk Dallas Shroeder apparently copied those files to protect citizen’s votes.
On March 11, 2022, Griswold attempted to get a lawsuit filed against her by several county clerks and county commissioners tossed.
Joining County Clerk Schroeder is Douglas County Clerk Merlin Klotz, and County Commissioners from Park and Rio Blanco counties, all who want access to election servers.
They want to see if the election equipment software update, known as a “Trusted Build” deleted election data.
When these county’s backups are forensically analyzed, evidence of similar activities could show Griswold’s illegal conduct was more widespread.
State law enforcement officials, including CO Attorney General Weiser, are expected to demand access to those backups in support of a thorough criminal investigation.
Griswold’s Other Desperate Attempts
Tina Peters, County Clerk and Recorder of Mesa County, has been the target of Griswold’s venom since the November 2020 Election.
Peters has been steadfast on integrity knowing election records are legally supposed to be preserved for 25 months per Colorado law, and 22 months according to Federal Law. This was all deleted from Mesa County’s Dominion machines.
Peter’s said Griswold’s bill “is not ‘an elections bill’, this is an attempt to further limit transparency into Colorado’s election process. Soros operative Gestapo Griswold’s Senate Bill 22-153 is a bald attempt to prevent anyone from knowing how our voting systems work. Among other things, it criminalized election officials’ free speech.”
Griswold found solace in a willing mainstream media to shield her…and go offensive with her fellow Soros influenced Democrats. She went to media, including NPR to criticize Peters and The Gateway Pundit for reporting on Griswold’s request to destroy 2020 Election data.
Peters copied election data from her county that Jena Griswold told her to delete. For this Griswold had Peters’ home and offices raided. Observers noted Griswold wanted to erase all the evidence from the 2020 election but Peters spoiled her plans.
By November 2021, Colorado citizens filed a lawsuit against Griswold. Hanks et al v. Griswold was filed in Denver District Court. The most damning facts of the case claim that Griswold and her employees destroyed election records from the 2020 election.
Griswold raided Clerk Peter’s office on August 10, 2021 with the approval of Mesa County DA, Dan Rubenstein and the newly appointed Sheriff Matt Lewis.
Griswold raided a home, in the middle of the night, with four children asleep. In the raid all electronics were confiscated, including children’s devices. This was related to the earlier raid.
Griswold raided Peter’s office a second time where she, in cooperation with Mesa County DA and Sheriff, seized the voting equipment. For some odd reason there was no official accounting of the equipment that was taken,
Regarding the Elbert County voting records, in an affidavit signed by Clerk Schroeder, he explains his actions:
“I was told that there was evidence that the ‘trusted build’ process that was performed on Mesa County’s Dominion voting system during May of 2021, had erased electronic files that were part of the 2020 election records,” he said. “This information was concerning, because I have a legal duty to retain election records for 25 months after every election.”
“The purpose of retaining the records is so that a proper audit of an election can be performed,” he explained. “I was concerned that the ‘trusted build’ process might erase electronic election records from the Elbert County elections systems, which would violate state law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment