Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Euthanasia Activist Arrested After Dead Woman Found Strangled Inside ‘Suicide Pod’

A prominent euthanasia activist is among several people who have been arrested after an American woman was found strangled to death inside one of Philip “Dr. Death” Nitschke’s so-called “suicide pods.”

Reuters reported that several people had been arrested by the Swiss police for “inducing and aiding and abetting suicide.”

Police launched an investigation after a 64-year-old American woman with a compromised immune system died in a so-called “Sarco” suicide capsule.

The death occurred “in a wood in the municipality of Merishausen” on September 23.

Among those arrested was pro-euthanasia group The Last Resort leader Florian Willet.

Willet was reportedly present when the woman died. 

The “Sarco” pod—short for “sarcophagus”—is the brainchild of Philip “Dr. Death” Nitschke.

Nitschke has previously been accused of attempting to glamorize “assisted suicide” through his slick, 3D-printed capsule.

The capsule proved controversial even in Switzerland, where assisted suicide has been legal since 1942 for those considered to have “sound” judgment.

On the side of the capsule is a quote by pop scientist Carl Sagan:

“We are made of star stuff. We are a way for the universe to know itself.”

As Slay News previously reported, Nitschke designed the pod so that people could climb inside and be euthanized with “the push of a button.”

Pushing the button fills the sealed pod with nitrogen gas.

In theory, the person should be put to sleep, and then die by suffocation. 

According to Willet, everything went off without a hitch and the woman was euthanized.

The woman, identified only as an American and mother of two, died in the middle of a forest, as planned.

The capsule had never been used before, and Sarco inventor Philip Nitschke attempted to follow the process by video call but missed some of what went on due to technical difficulties.

Willet insisted that this is what happened.

He was the only person present for the woman’s death, which he described as “peaceful, fast, and dignified.”

However, police found evidence to confirm that the woman didn’t die in the way Willet claims.

The Swiss chief prosecutor of the case, Peter Sticher, discovered that the death might have gone quite differently.

Sticher revealed that investigators found evidence that the woman had been strangled to death in a case of “intentional homicide,” reports the Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant.

The newspaper reports that the pod was opened and closed several times before the woman pressed the button which triggered the procedure, to test its closure.

A forensic doctor present at the scene told the court that the woman had, among other things, severe injuries to her neck. 

According to the news outlet, Willet, who was standing beside the woman throughout the event, was heard telling the pod’s designer over video call: “She’s still alive, Philip.”

The comments came six-and-a-half minutes after the user pressed the button to end her own life.

Willet is said to have been confused by the sound of an alarm – thought to be a heart-rate monitor.

The court heard how he continued to lean over the Sarco pod to peer inside before the alarm ceased. 

Police had previously warned Sarco’s operators that prosecution would follow any usage of the capsule.

However, they did not appear to suspect how grim the situation might become.

The Last Resort insisted that the woman opted for Sarco because she had “skull base osteomyelitis.”

The organization argued that the condition caused her “severe pain” for “at least two years.”

Two lawyers “involved with the project” who were also present at the scene of the alleged “suicide” alerted the police of her death.

The police then swept the forest and arrested everyone in the vicinity, including a press photographer.  

Chief Prosecutor Peter Sticher told the Swiss outlet Blick:

“We warned them in writing, we said that if they came to Schaffhausen and used Sarco, they would face criminal consequences.”

All those involved with the Sarco death have been released with the exception of Willet.

Sticher noted that a “criminal investigation into the pod is underway and all of the 371 active applications have been suspended for use.”

Nitschke is defending his invention, insisting that the woman “almost immediately” pressed the button after climbing into the capsule.

“She didn’t really say anything,” he claimed.

“She really wanted to die.

“My estimate is that she lost consciousness within two minutes and that she died after five minutes.”

Questions around the woman’s death hark back to a similar case a year ago, where a young woman being euthanized in Belgium was allegedly suffocated by the euthanasia practitioner.

The woman’s family said they could hear her screams as she was smothered with a pillow when the lethal injection failed to kill her.

https://slaynews.com/news/euthanasia-activist-arrested-dead-woman-found-strangled-inside-suicide-pod/

DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith Reportedly Evaluating Full Dismissal of Federal Cases Against President-Elect Trump Ahead of Inauguration

The Biden Gestapo Department of Justice (DOJ) and Special Counsel Jack Smith are reportedly scrambling to find ways to abandon their witch hunt against President-elect Donald Trump as he prepares to assume office.

According to sources close to the DOJ per NBC, high-level officials are now debating how to sideline both the Jan. 6 and classified documents cases.

Despite substantial evidence suggesting these cases were politically motivated, DOJ officials are now faced with the reality that they won’t achieve a trial anytime soon, regardless of who resides in the Oval Office.

With legal challenges and appeals poised to escalate to the Supreme Court, the department finally seems to realize that their flimsy cases lack the substance needed to hold in any meaningful court setting.

NBC reported:

Now that Trump will become president again, DOJ officials see no room to pursue either criminal case against him — and no point in continuing to litigate them in the weeks before he takes office, the people said.

[…]

The sources said it will be up to Smith to decide exactly how to unwind the charges and many questions remain unanswered. Could the prosecutions resume after Trump leaves office or would they be time-barred? What happens to the evidence? What about the two other defendants charged with helping Trump hide classified documents? Will the special counsel write a report, as special counsels usually do?

The sources say all those issues require study and research.

At the same time, Trump’s legal team is weighing its own next steps for how to resolve the outstanding federal cases in his favor now that he is the projected winner of the election. The ultimate goal is to get all the federal and state cases wiped out completely — the strategic call is how best to accomplish that task, according to a person familiar with the discussions.

If the Trump side, for example, moved again in court to dismiss the charges in Washington related to election interference, then the Justice Department could use its legal response to explain its position on not moving forward with that case.

Trump’s New York criminal case presents different challenges with a felony conviction and sentencing hearing scheduled for Nov. 26. The immediate goal of Trump’s legal team is to get that postponed indefinitely or otherwise dismissed.

WATCH:

Former Attorney General Bill Barr also called for the dismissal of charges against president-elect Trump.

“The American people have rendered their verdict on President Trump, and decisively chosen him to lead the country for the next four years,” Barr said in an interview with Fox News.

“They did that with full knowledge of the claims against him by prosecutors around the country and I think Attorney General Garland and the state prosecutors should respect the people’s decision and dismiss the cases against President Trump now,” he added.

It was also reported that Jack Smith will step down before Trump is sworn in.

The decision to potentially wind down these cases also reflect Trump’s own stated intentions for his return to office.

In a recent interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, Trump didn’t mince words, declaring he would fire Jack Smith “within two seconds” of taking the oath of office.

Hugh Hewitt: So you’re going to have a very tough choice the day after you take the oath of office, or maybe even the day that you take the oath of office. You’re either going to have to pardon yourself, or you’re going to have to fire Jack Smith. Which one will you do?

Donald Trump: Oh, it’s so easy. It’s so easy. In fact, he’s a crooked person. He’s a …person. We had a brave, brilliant judge in Florida. She’s a brilliant judge, by the way. I don’t know her. I never spoke to her. Never spoke to her. But we had a brave and very brilliant judge. And what she has suffered through with these out of control people, she was listening to why, you know, putting out statements. She doesn’t move fast. She doesn’t do this. She doesn’t do that. Well, she moved fast. But the fact is, we had, and the big case was that case, the documents case. You even said oh, that’s the big case.

Hugh Hewitt: Yes, I did.

Donald Trump: We won the documents case. We’re in the process of winning all the other cases, I think. Even sometimes when we have to go to appeal. We got immunity at the Supreme Court. It’s so easy. I would fire him within two seconds. He’ll be one of the first things addressed.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/doj-special-counsel-jack-smith-reportedly-evaluating-full/

Nathan Hochman ousts embattled liberal prosecutor George Gascón as LA County DA amid crime concerns

 Hochman campaigned on the 'public safety failure' of Gascón’s liberal policies


Nathan Hochman defeated incumbent progressive prosecutor George Gascón in the race for Los Angeles County district attorney as crime was seen as a top issue of the election cycle.

Hochman, a former federal prosecutor, campaigned as a "hard middle" candidate, rejecting both mass incarceration and the "public safety failure" of Gascón’s liberal policies, which Hochman said led to increased crime and a lack of consequences for juvenile offenders.

"The voters of Los Angeles County have spoken and have said enough is enough of D.A. Gascón's pro-criminal extreme policies; they look forward to a safer future," Hochman said in a statement early Wednesday. "As D.A., I look forward to representing all of the people, whether they voted for me or not, since their safety will be my responsibility."

A representative for Gascón's campaign did not immediately respond to The Associated Press' call for comment.

Nathan Hochman

Hochman, a former federal prosecutor, unseated liberal incumbent District Attorney George Gascón in Los Angeles County. 

The FBI's preliminary data for 2022 had predicted that violent crime dropped by a slim 2.1% from 2021-2022. The FBI updated the data in October, however, and found that violent crime actually rose by 4.5%.

During debates, Hochman spotlighted rising violent crime in the county, a trend also seen statewide and at the national level. He also received the support of local police unions despite Gascón’s previous service as a police officer.

Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon

Gascón is known as the godfather of progressive prosecutors.

The prosecutors' union called Hochman’s victory a "pivotal moment in the fight to return balance and accountability to the justice system."

Gascón has faced two recall attempts as the state grew increasingly discontent with progressive policies. He is also facing a lawsuit from the union representing the prosecutors who work in his office for withholding information on a close ally in an alleged violation of the California Public Records Act (CPRA).

A Southern California native, Hochman emphasized his past prosecutorial experience as assistant U.S. attorney in California’s Central District. He has also practiced as a private defense attorney.

He previously ran unsuccessfully for California attorney general as a Republican, but was an independent in this race and describes himself as a lifelong centrist.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/nathan-hochman-ousts-embattled-liberal-prosecutor-george-gascon-la-county-da-amid-crime-concerns

Former AG Bill Barr: Prosecutors Must Drop Lawfare Cases Against President-Elect Trump.



Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, who served in the first administration of President Donald J. Trump, is calling on his successor Merrick Garland—as well as Democrat District Attorneys Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis—to dismiss all criminal charges against the Republican president-elect. Barr contends that the verdict issued by the American people, based on Trump’s landslide electoral victory, should supersede their lawfare prosecutions.

“The American people have rendered their verdict on President Trump and decisively chosen him to lead the country for the next four years. They chose him to lead us with full knowledge of the claims against him by prosecutors around the country,” Barr said Wednesday in a statement. He continued: “I think Attorney General Merrick Garland and the State prosecutors should respect the people’s decision and dismiss the cases against President Trump now.”

Trump’s former Attorney General argues that the indictments against the president-elect are largely based on “novel legal theories” that “have already been gravely weakened by a series of court decisions.” Barr states that both the federal and state prosecutions against Trump have been “aired and rejected in the court of public opinion.” He adds that once Trump takes the Oath of Office, the U.S. Consitution renders the cases moot.

While at least three of the cases against Trump could be dropped now that he has won the 2024 presidential election, the former and future Republican president was found guilty of 34 counts of business record fraud in New York City. Trump is set to be sentenced by Judge Juan Merchan on November 26, though the judge may rule that presidential immunity effectively ends the legal action against him.

https://thenationalpulse.com/

It's Already Getting Ugly Within the Kamala Harris Campaign: Report

Vice President Kamala Harris talks to her campaign staff in front of Air Force Two as she prepares to depart from Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Friday.
Vice President Kamala Harris talks to her campaign staff in front of Air Force Two as she prepares to depart from Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Friday.

The blame game is under way after Vice President Kamala Harris took a humiliating shellacking in Tuesday’s presidential election.

Hours after former President Donald Trump capped his years-long campaign to return to the White House by making the electoral college map a study in red, fierce finger-pointing was taking place among Democrats, Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich posted on X.

“The blame game has begun inside Harris world,” she wrote, sharing the perspective of Lindy Li, a member of the Democratic National Committee’s National Finance Committee and Pennsylvania commissioner.

The post-mortem began with the selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as Harris’s running mate, Heinrich wrote.

Walz ran into headwinds amid allegations of fabricating his National Guard record.

“Tim Walz was a bad choice of running mate, Shapiro would have carried the blue wall,” Heinrich wrote, referring to the states of Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania that have often carried Democrats to victory.

“People are wondering tonight what would have happened had Shapiro been on the ticket,” Li said, speaking about Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro who was not selected by Harris.

“And not only in terms of Pennsylvania. He’s a famously a moderate. So that would have signaled to the American people that she is not the San Francisco liberal that Trump said she was, but she went with someone actually to her left Minnesota. … In the eyes of the American people, Walz was the governor who oversaw the protests,” Li said.

Heinrich wrote that “Harris’ positions were not clearly staked out.”

Heinrich quoted Li as saying that Harris “knows [what] a mistake [it] was to say on ‘The View’ that she couldn’t think of a single thing that she would do differently from the Biden administration”

The Harris fixation on branding Trump as a fascist failed, Heinrich wrote.

“Too many cooks in the kitchen led to muddled campaign messaging, poor staffing decisions in key battlegrounds,” Heinrich wrote.

Related:
Kamala Pulls a Hillary at Election Night Party as Her Chances Go Up in Smoke

Li told Heinrich that the campaign made changes in Pennsylvania “in the final weeks of the campaign, but I fear it was too late.”Writing on CNN, Edward-Isaac Dovere said Harris’ refusal to paint herself as an agent of change cost her.

“A country crying out for change got a candidate who, at a crucial moment as more voters were tuning in, decided to soft-pedal the change she knew she represented,” he wrote.

https://www.westernjournal.com/already-getting-ugly-within-kamala-harris-campaign-report/?

Juan Williams Flips Out on Fox News and Makes Insane Race-Baiting Statement Following President Trump’s Historic Victory – Then He Gets Smacked Down By Karl Rove

Fox News’s Juan Williams throws a fit as Trump destroys Kamala Harris to win the 2024 Presidential election.

As Jim Hoft reported earlier this morning, President Donald J. Trump CRUSHED Kamala Harris to become the second US president in history to win the White House in two non-consecutive terms. This massive victory was powered by a historic multiracial coalition that no Republican has ever managed before.

In addition, Republicans seized control of the Senate and appeared on their way to narrowly retaining the House of Representatives. The prospect of a Republican trifecta, especially with Trump returning to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, is unsurprisingly sending liberals into hysterics.

Last night, Juan Williams on Fox News offered a preview of what will come from the left.

Once Trump’s victory was certain, the Fox News election panel began discussing what factors led to his historic win. Instead of focusing on kitchen table issues like the economy and immigration, Williams lost his temper as he whipped out the old race card and included an insane twist.

He not only blamed Harris’s defeat on ‘white racism,’ he also trashed black and Hispanic men for betraying her in favor of ‘bro politics.’ Yes, he implied that black males were bigoted because they voted against Harris. Talk about lunacy.

“I’m not sold on this idea that, oh, it was the cost of eggs. I worry that it was, ‘Well, I’m not voting for this woman. Or I’m not voting for this black woman,'” Williams whined. “The bro strategy also had some impact in terms of Latino and black men who came along and gave higher percentages.”

“I think there are tensions between racial groups, and people might feel that,” Williams continued. “Obviously, you can exploit those tensions, and you can exacerbate them to the point where you can politically benefit from it. Do I think that’s the reason he won?

“No. I think the reason he won is you look at that bro strategy and the white male turnout and white grievance politics that he has used to great success in this country.”

WATCH:

This race-baiting tirade from Williams was so asinine that long-time Never-Trumper and Bush ally Karl Rove was able to deliver an epic smackdown in response.

“I just think it is extremely odd to suggest that black men are somehow prejudiced because they vote for a white candidate who says, I want to make certain that everybody has an opportunity to succeed in our great economy, I want you to be more prosperous, and I will do things that will make it possible for you to make a better life,” Rove fired back.

“That is an appeal to their best instincts. He did not go out and say, vote for me because I’m not a woman. Don’t vote for me because I’m a white man,” Rove added. “And to suggest that somehow black men are racist because they supported a white man is just too far, Juan.”

BIG BREAKING: The Houthis just announced an immediate CEASEFIRE after Trump wins the election

 

The Houthis are already panicking over the fact that President Trump won the election and just announced an immediate ceasefire of their hostilities against Israel and other ships navigating Red Sea.

They wrote on X that their attack on both Israel and international ships were “for defensive purposes only” and “we announce an immediate ceasefire.”

The Houthis know that President Trump won’t tolerate their hostility and outrageous attacks like Biden has and are running scared.

Amazing! It’s not just morning in America again, it’s morning in the world! This is what strength looks like!

Love it!

https://therightscoop.com/big-breaking-the-houthis-just-announced-an-immediate-ceasefire-after-trump-wins-the-election/

Euthanasia Activist Arrested After Dead Woman Found Strangled Inside ‘Suicide Pod’

A prominent euthanasia activist is among several people who have been arrested after an American woman was found strangled to death inside o...